quicwg multipath issues

quicwg / multipath

In-progress version of draft-ietf-quic-multipath

Other

56 stars 21 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Editorial: fix requirement of opening a new path

#418 Yanmei-Liu closed 2 months ago
1
Editorial: reconstruct sentence of "SHOULD use MP_NEW/RETIRE_CONN_ID frames"

#417 Yanmei-Liu closed 2 months ago
1
Editorial: add reference for MP_NEW_CONN_ID frame

#416 Yanmei-Liu closed 2 months ago
0
Editorial: fix error internal ref

#415 Yanmei-Liu closed 4 months ago
0
Abandon Frame needs Error Code definition

#414 gloinul opened 4 months ago
15
Example for PATH_ABANDON does not follow spec recommendation

#413 gloinul closed 4 months ago
3
What is sending MAX_PATH_ID really doing?

#412 gloinul closed 4 months ago
1
Client and server differences not correctly handled in sentence.

#411 gloinul closed 2 months ago
3
Use of Respectively without a sequence

#410 gloinul closed 2 months ago
2
What is an active path?

#409 gloinul closed 2 months ago
1
Editorial: Wrong parenthis to create ref

#408 gloinul closed 4 months ago
1
Is using the next available new PATH ID or a new CID that is what matters?

#407 gloinul closed 2 months ago
0
What happens if requirement can't be fulfilled in MUST use new CID

#406 gloinul closed 4 months ago
1
Editorial: SHOULD for the wrong aspect on when to use MP_*_CONNECTION_ID frames

#405 gloinul closed 2 months ago
4
Editorial: Refere to frame type

#404 gloinul closed 2 months ago
1
Describe the effect of disable_active_migration more accurately

#403 Yanmei-Liu closed 2 months ago
1
Add MAX_PATH_ID_BLOCKED frame and related texts

#402 yfmascgy closed 2 months ago
1
Specify details of MP_RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID

#401 huitema closed 4 months ago
0
Multiple paths may use the same 4 tuple.

#400 huitema closed 4 months ago
0
Multiple paths may share the same 4-tuple.

#399 huitema closed 4 months ago
0
We need to review the path initiation paragraph.

#398 huitema closed 4 months ago
2
What to do on path time-out?

#397 mirjak closed 1 month ago
9
Proposal to make path status sequence number per path.

#396 mirjak closed 2 months ago
3
stream boundaries of retransmissions

#395 mirjak closed 4 months ago
0
limit initial_max_path to 2^32-1 and more explanation

#394 mirjak closed 4 months ago
1
More guidance on "standby"

#393 mirjak closed 4 months ago
0
Spell out LIA

#392 mirjak closed 4 months ago
0
AEAD limits and use of multiple nonces

#391 mirjak closed 4 months ago
0
What if a packet with a CID belonging to a new Path ID without path challenge is received?

#390 mirjak closed 1 month ago
6
remove probing concept and text on migration

#389 mirjak closed 2 months ago
2
Clarify denying a path and move text

#388 mirjak closed 2 months ago
1
Editorial minor change to not repeat RFC9000 behaviour

#387 mirjak closed 4 months ago
0
clarify error handling and normative language for max path id

#386 mirjak closed 4 months ago
0
Rename ACK_MP frame to MP_ACK

#385 qdeconinck closed 4 months ago
0
[=] Cleanup MAX_PATHS

#384 Yanmei-Liu closed 5 months ago
0
First shot for Security Consideration

#383 Yanmei-Liu closed 5 months ago
1
Rewrite outdated examples in Section 6

#382 Yanmei-Liu closed 5 months ago
0
Do we need to allow transport parameter "initial_max_path_id" to be set to 0?

#381 Yanmei-Liu closed 5 months ago
5
Editorial: Move "sending ACKs" subsection

#380 mirjak closed 5 months ago
0
Editorial: Merge of overview into intro & subsections

#379 mirjak closed 5 months ago
0
Do we need further guidance if multiple paths over the same 4-tuple are used?

#378 mirjak closed 2 months ago
5
Rewrite the path close section to specify symmetric Abandon

#377 huitema closed 5 months ago
1
Rename transport parameter initial_max_paths to initial_max_path_id

#376 Yanmei-Liu closed 5 months ago
1
Recommendations regarding CID allocation and Path ID continuity

#375 qdeconinck closed 5 months ago
1
There is always a valid CID now for each path

#374 mirjak closed 5 months ago
3
[~] Endpoints MUST send Path Abandon for path closure(including idle …

#373 Yanmei-Liu closed 5 months ago
1
Cleanup MAX_PATHS

#372 martinthomson closed 5 months ago
2
Should the seq number space of MP_NEW_CONNECTION_ID be per-path or global?

#371 mirjak closed 5 months ago
8
How should a client signal that it does not have enough CIDs to use for multiple unused path identifiers?

#370 yfmascgy closed 6 months ago
2
path state -> path status

#369 mirjak closed 6 months ago
1

Previous Next