-
**Describe problem solved by the proposed feature**
After PR281 https://github.com/PX4/avoidance/pull/281, local planner use the parameter from PX4 firmware.
However, there isn't limitation for…
sunzj updated
5 years ago
-
@AmirMz1 Radar will detect obstacles infront of it and this code shown will show the detected points with its velocity, azimuth, altitude and longitudinal distance from radar.
You wil…
-
## Bug report
The MPPI controller outputs a near zero cmd_vel after a dynamic param change.
It creates strange behavior where the robot slows down when changing its speed limit:
![mppi_zero_vel_aft…
-
Is this project for Python3 or Python2?
-
Write a _short_ summary about what you have done within this project, to put on our website. It should include:
- development process and details of technology used (including models, add-ons, libr…
-
Met with toy design team on 4/10
Goal: Prototype greybox prototype by 4/17
Ryan will be developing controls
Haiying will be developing obstacle Generation: Obstacles move, character stays in pl…
-
Hey, (@ZJU-jxlin, @bigsuperZZZX )
Firstly - Congrats on this amazing planner and thanks for this contribution.
I am trying to replicate this setup using a jetson orin nano, FC with PX4 1.14, D43…
-
It's interesting having different types of terrain have different levels of resistance to movement, meaning that the `move` command takes a different ammount of ticks to execute depending on what type…
-
# Climb Terrain Curriculum - Can't progress to harder terrain
## Context
The objective is to train a policy able to climb up and down stairs. For that, a terrain called `STAIRS_TERRAINS_CFG` has b…
-
## Bug report
Not sure if this is a bug, but the behavior is surely puzzling, so I think it's worth reporting. I found that, for certain values of `cost_scaling_factor` parameter (I saw with 4.…
corot updated
2 months ago