jcp-org import-issues-test issues

jcp-org / import-issues-test

0 stars 0 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

JSR348-94: Spec leads can end-of-life a Specification, withdraw licenses

#88 apastsya closed 7 years ago
6
JSR348-93: Comments on the Standing Rules from Anish Karmarkar

#87 apastsya closed 7 years ago
15
JSR348-91: State the document version explicitly in the Executive Summary

#86 apastsya closed 7 years ago
8
JSR348-90: Do we need the defined term Release?

#85 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-89: Make the list of Definitions more like an index, with "virtual entries" pointing to others

#84 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-88: The term member under the 5 member rule needs clarification in the terms of a JUG membership

#83 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-87: The definition of Profile Specification contains normative requirements that should be moved to the body of the document

#82 apastsya closed 7 years ago
2
JSR348-86: Improve clarity of Member definition

#81 apastsya closed 7 years ago
16
JSR348-85: Improve clarity in 4.2 signature tests

#80 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-84: Should Mailing List be a defined term?

#79 apastsya closed 7 years ago
6
JSR348-83: Spec Lead v. Spec Lead Member

#78 apastsya closed 7 years ago
6
JSR348-82: The definition of Dormant needs clarification

#77 apastsya closed 7 years ago
6
JSR348-81: "Dormant" definition mentions "life cycle"

#76 apastsya closed 7 years ago
4
JSR348-80: Strange artifact at the top of the Process Document

#75 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-79: Should the Process Document specify what is appropriate for a Maintenance Release?

#74 apastsya closed 7 years ago
6
JSR348-78: More refactoring (into Expert Group Membership)

#73 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-77: Sections 1.2.3 and 1.7 overlap too much and should be merged

#72 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-76: Minor language changes suggested by Alex Buckley

#71 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-75: Restucture the Executive Summary section

#70 apastsya closed 7 years ago
2
JSR348-74: Refactor the balloting requirements to reduce duplication

#69 apastsya closed 7 years ago
4
JSR348-73: Should the process for modifying the Standing Rules document be specified in the Process Doc?

#68 apastsya closed 7 years ago
5
JSR348-72: Require EGs to maintain a public Document Archive

#67 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-71: Issue Tracker should be a defined term

#66 apastsya closed 7 years ago
14
JSR348-70: Simplify Maintenance Review process by eliminating Item Exception Ballot and Change Log

#65 apastsya closed 7 years ago
13
JSR348-69: The Standing Rules document should have a version number

#64 apastsya closed 7 years ago
2
JSR348-68: Clarify that the JSPA is sufficient for contributions

#63 apastsya closed 7 years ago
6
JSR348-64: Should there be a limit on the number of members from a single company/organization who can join an Expert Group?

#62 apastsya closed 7 years ago
5
JSR348-63: The use of the term "representatives" in the definition of Member is confusing

#61 apastsya closed 7 years ago
5
JSR348-62: Add an additional vote type to section 6 called "Conditional Yes"

#60 apastsya closed 7 years ago
5
JSR348-61: Reference the issue tracker when discussing comments on "no" votes

#59 apastsya closed 7 years ago
7
JSR348-60: Typos in current draft

#58 apastsya closed 7 years ago
13
JSR348-59: Simplify Mailing Lists section

#57 apastsya closed 7 years ago
6
JSR348-58: Clean up and expand on the process for revising the Standing Rules

#56 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-57: Distinction between JSR "ballots" and EC "votes" is still not entirely clear

#55 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-56: Define the the time-out periods

#54 apastsya closed 7 years ago
13
JSR348-55: Typo on line 225

#53 apastsya closed 7 years ago
2
JSR348-54: Formatting of Item Exception Ballot in definitions section

#52 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-53: "Reasonable increases in price" should not be considered changes in licensing terms

#51 apastsya closed 7 years ago
2
JSR348-52: Clarify when a 2/3 majority is required to approve a new JSR

#50 apastsya closed 7 years ago
4
JSR348-51: When a Spec Lead withdraws the replacement should be sought from the Member company

#49 apastsya closed 7 years ago
11
JSR348-50: Clarify the meaning of the term "release"

#48 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-49: Preparing the drafts for Public Review

#47 apastsya closed 7 years ago
2
JSR348-48: Should the PMO be referred to as "who" or "which"?

#46 apastsya closed 7 years ago
5
JSR348-47: Suggested wording changes for the Standing Rules

#45 apastsya closed 7 years ago
2
JSR348-46: Process for shutting down a JSR when the Spec Lead is unresponsive or inactive is underspecified

#44 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-45: The new wording describing the EG membership application process omits the PMO's role (from Harold Ogle)

#43 apastsya closed 7 years ago
2
JSR348-44: Current PMO practice is to label "stalled" JSRs as Dormant. Can we retroactively apply the new JSR Renewal Ballot process?

#42 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-43: Suggested wording changes from Harold Ogle

#41 apastsya closed 7 years ago
3
JSR348-42: Typo in line 229

#40 apastsya closed 7 years ago
2
JSR348-41: Section numbering

#39 apastsya closed 7 years ago
4

Previous Next