-
I ended up creating a new issue from: https://github.com/marbl/canu/issues/2340 , because my issue is different. Thanks!
@skoren Here is my 20Gb sample that crashed due to memory (conda activat…
-
Dear dev,
I am trying to use BOSS-RUN with a barcoded run (simulated) and I am struggling with the .toml file config. the readfish.toml looks like that :
```
[barcodes.barcode01]
name = "barc…
-
Hi,
Thanks for the software to simulate nanopore reads. I get a bit confused while using the simulator.py with --number.
From the help message, --number suggests the number of reads to be simula…
-
Hi Nanopore team,
I noticed a significant (~10x) slow down of the Dorado basecaller when adding the 6mA modification model. This is notable since adding the 5mCG_5hmCG modification model have almos…
-
Hello,
I was wondering whether there are any plans to incorporate support for Pore-C data instead of HiC for phasing? I assume the multiway contacts and longer fragment lengths would be in theory m…
-
would it be possible and would it be hard to add an option to print to file any reads which do not map to the PRG?
-
Hi,
Thank you for developing and maintaining this project!
I am trying to extract the raw signal using SquigglePull.py.
It seems to work, but the .tsv files were containing nothing.
Can you help…
-
Hello,
I am trying to run the ARTIC pipeline on the Singularity profile with the new ARTIC V4 primer scheme set (https://github.com/artic-network/primer-schemes).
I am running the Nextflow pipeli…
-
Hi, Soren,
Thank you for developing the tool. It is easy to install and I can run your test dataset successfully.
However, when I run my own fastq file with the corresponding f/F/r/R sequences, I …
-
falco version 0.3.0
Fastqc and falco results are differrent for section "Per base sequence quality"
Per base sequence quality seqtion to compare in results:
[pbsq_falco.txt](https://github.com/…