tsvwg draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options issues

tsvwg / draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options

0 stars 0 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 11.9: Authentication

#58 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
4
Erik: correct or remove erroneous note in Step 3 of the fragmentation procedure (Section 11.4)

#57 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
2
Erik: Inconsistency in Security Considerations regarding not passing FRAG, NOP, and EOL to the upper layer

#56 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
2
MD/CMH: Remove misleading stray text from Section 11.6

#55 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
0
CMH: Clarify the exact meaning of MRDS size

#54 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
1
CMH: Simplify language stating that FRAG is not reported to the user.

#53 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
0
MD/CMH: Change minimum reassembled UDP datagram size from 3000 to 2926

#52 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
0
CMH: Clarification for FRAG Option Corner Cases

#51 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
0
NiT (Erik): Section 6

#50 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
0
CMH: Clarify that EOL indicates the end the options in the per-fragment option area just as it does in the per-datagram surplus area

#49 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
0
CMH: Instructions regarding placement of must-support options are overly prescriptive

#48 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
0
CMH: Apply "first instance only" rule to options received in fragments as well as in the surplus area

#47 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
0
CMH: Instructions on order of option processing

#46 Mike-Heard opened 2 months ago
0
WGLC: Is it OK for the endpoints to send information in UDP options which can be read (only) by the transit nodes and react to it?

#45 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
1
Various: Commentry on options being opt-in

#44 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
2
ZS/CMH: Backwards compatibility with UDP

#43 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
3
GF/CMH/ZS: WGLC Comments - Use cases

#42 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
2
Tom H: WGLC comments on Appendix A:

#41 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
3
Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 12: "UNSAFE options are not safe to ignore"

#40 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
1
Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 11.3: APC Title; combination of APC & OCS; and silently ignore when failing

#39 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
1
Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 7: Surplus area

#38 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
2
Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 7: OCS

#37 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
1
Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 5

#36 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
2
Tom H: WGLC Additions to terminology in Section 3

#35 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
2
Tom H: WGLC comments on design of APC and Auth

#34 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
1
Med: WGLC Minor NiTs

#33 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
1
Med: WGLC Comments on Magic Number?

#32 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
7
Med: WGLC Comments on RES/REQ

#31 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
0
Med: WGLC Comments on Frag

#30 gorryfair opened 2 months ago
3
Should UDP ExIDs be distinct from TCP ExIDs, or use a common namespace?

#29 jtouch opened 3 months ago
3
IANA evaluation response

#28 jtouch opened 3 months ago
2
WGLC issue: Check draft name citation for [To24], rev -31

#27 gorryfair closed 19 hours ago
2
Address IPv6 jumbo grams

#26 jtouch closed 3 months ago
12
Reduce reduce implementation complexity by limiting per-fragment options to specific ones and fixing per-fragment option placement

#25 Mike-Heard closed 3 months ago
10
The API extensions for UDP Options must allow UDP fragmentation to be on or off for any send request

#24 Mike-Heard closed 3 months ago
6
The definition of UNSAFE options should not be limited to options that modify user data

#23 Mike-Heard closed 3 months ago
49
NiTs on draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-28

#22 gorryfair closed 3 months ago
6
Processing and requirements of APC and Authentication options

#21 tompandadev closed 3 months ago
13
Wordsmithing error in draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-23 Section 9.4

#20 Mike-Heard closed 7 months ago
4
Typo in draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-23 Section 9.1

#19 Mike-Heard closed 9 months ago
2
Add design principles per IETF 117 slide deck

#18 jtouch closed 3 months ago
4
Could we avoid being judgmental about design of middleboxes?

#17 gorryfair closed 9 months ago
8
* Section 9.4: Should new codes be defined for ICMPv4 and ICMPv6 Time Exceeded messages to indicate UDP reassembly failures?

#16 Mike-Heard closed 7 months ago
18
* Section 22: Specify that RES may be sent other than on return traffic only when DLPMTUD is enabled.

#15 Mike-Heard closed 7 months ago
10
* Section 9.7: Specify that RES echoes the token in the most recently receive REQ

#14 Mike-Heard closed 7 months ago
16
* Section 9.6: Change "segment" to "datagram"

#13 Mike-Heard closed 9 months ago
6
* Section 7: should OCS be mandatory under circumstances other than UDP CS <> 0?

#12 Mike-Heard closed 7 months ago
37
* Section 22: should compare TCP and UDP

#11 gorryfair closed 9 months ago
2
* Section 12: The inner if clauses in the pseudo-code seem to be inconsistent

#10 gorryfair closed 7 months ago
10
Consistent use of ">>" as a marker

#9 gorryfair closed 7 months ago
11